Chippewa vs Osage Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Osage
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Osage
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Osage Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,134,116 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.398. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 24.4 Osage.
Chippewa vs Osage Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $50,292, a difference of 8.5%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $39,568, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $45,764, a difference of 2.7%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $36,034, a difference of 2.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $55,677, a difference of 3.4%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Osage |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Tragic $39,568 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Tragic $91,926 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Tragic $75,240 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Tragic $42,651 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Tragic $50,292 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Tragic $36,034 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Tragic $45,764 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Tragic $84,461 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Tragic $88,390 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Tragic $55,677 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 27.1% |
Chippewa vs Osage Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 25.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 19.1%), and male poverty (14.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and single father poverty (18.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Osage |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 13.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 9.7% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 14.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 16.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Tragic 19.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 17.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 17.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 16.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 24.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 32.6% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Excellent 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Average 11.7% |
Chippewa vs Osage Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 40.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 31.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 13.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Osage |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Good 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Chippewa vs Osage Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.58%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Osage |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Tragic 63.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 78.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 39.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 82.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 82.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 80.6% |
Chippewa vs Osage Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 33.0%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 25.4%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.71%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (62.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Osage |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 63.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Average 6.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Excellent 47.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 13.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Fair 32.1% |
Chippewa vs Osage Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.80%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 2.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Osage |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 58.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 22.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Chippewa vs Osage Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 8.8%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.7% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 0.12%), college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Osage |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 84.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 62.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 55.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 41.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 33.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.7% |
Chippewa vs Osage Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Osage communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (14.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Osage |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 14.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 14.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 27.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |