Chippewa vs Colville Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Colville
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Colville
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,752
SOCIAL INDEX
15.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
289th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Colville Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,904,100 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Colville within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.613. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Colville. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 34.5 Colville.
Chippewa vs Colville Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Colville communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 17.3%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $37,514, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $49,774, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($70,539 compared to $70,094, a difference of 0.63%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $85,792, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $82,474, a difference of 1.8%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Colville |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Tragic $38,047 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Tragic $85,792 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Tragic $70,094 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Tragic $42,151 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Tragic $48,516 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Tragic $37,514 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Tragic $49,774 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Tragic $82,604 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Tragic $82,474 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Tragic $51,739 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Exceptional 21.3% |
Chippewa vs Colville Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Colville communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 24.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.1%), male poverty (14.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and poverty (15.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 5.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Colville |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 16.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 17.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 29.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Tragic 25.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 23.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 24.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 22.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 18.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 29.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 21.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 39.3% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 18.3% |
Chippewa vs Colville Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Colville communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 65.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 34.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.84%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Colville |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 7.4% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Tragic 29.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 11.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 9.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 11.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Chippewa vs Colville Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Colville communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Colville |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Tragic 59.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Tragic 73.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 81.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 79.5% |
Chippewa vs Colville Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Colville communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 7.9%), single father households (3.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.2% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 0.46%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.61%), and family households (62.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Colville |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 63.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 26.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Tragic 41.0% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Tragic 43.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 45.3% |
Chippewa vs Colville Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Colville communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 47.2%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 44.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 2.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 86.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 19.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Colville |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 13.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Tragic 86.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Good 55.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 25.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Chippewa vs Colville Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Colville communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.2%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Colville |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 96.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Excellent 96.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Average 94.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Fair 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 90.1% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 83.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 62.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 54.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 38.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 29.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
Chippewa vs Colville Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Colville communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 74.7%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.9%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and female disability (14.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 7.7%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Colville |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 15.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 16.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 3.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 15.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 30.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 55.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 5.3% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.1% |