Chippewa vs Immigrants from Dominican Republic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,567,515 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominican Republic within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.164. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Immigrants from Dominican Republic. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 16.9 Immigrants from Dominican Republic.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 21.5%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $45,758, a difference of 17.7%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $81,233, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $80,319, a difference of 0.39%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $70,208, a difference of 0.47%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $46,655, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 54.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 53.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 50.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 29.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 40.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 71.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 19.1%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.2%), and married-couple households (42.1% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.0%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 232.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 131.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 106.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 32.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 72.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 106.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 107.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 54.0%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 0.41%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 65.3%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 63.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 3.8%).