Chippewa vs South African Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
South African
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
South Africans
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,851
SOCIAL INDEX
86.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
44th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
South African Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,251,530 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.112. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in South Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 1.9 South Africans.
Chippewa vs South African Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and South African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $50,044, a difference of 36.6%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $61,460, a difference of 32.6%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $93,379, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,383, a difference of 9.3%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $41,825, a difference of 19.5%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | South African |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Exceptional $50,044 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Exceptional $113,229 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Exceptional $93,379 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Exceptional $50,752 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Exceptional $61,460 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Exceptional $41,825 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Poor $51,383 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Exceptional $103,160 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Exceptional $109,719 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Exceptional $65,652 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 28.0% |
Chippewa vs South African Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and South African communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 47.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 44.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.9%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 16.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | South African |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Excellent 12.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 21.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Excellent 13.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Average 12.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Excellent 20.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Good 16.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Excellent 28.5% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Chippewa vs South African Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and South African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 82.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 43.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | South African |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Good 5.4% |
Chippewa vs South African Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and South African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | South African |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Good 65.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Average 36.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Average 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Fair 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Fair 82.6% |
Chippewa vs South African Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and South African communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.6%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 39.8%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.0%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | South African |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 63.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Excellent 47.3% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.17 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 47.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Excellent 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Excellent 30.5% |
Chippewa vs South African Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and South African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.76%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 8.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | South African |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Good 10.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Good 90.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Fair 6.2% |
Chippewa vs South African Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and South African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 64.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 58.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | South African |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 92.4% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Exceptional 90.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Exceptional 87.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 69.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Exceptional 64.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Exceptional 51.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 43.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Chippewa vs South African Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and South African communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 68.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 40.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 6.4%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.9%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | South African |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Exceptional 21.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 45.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Fair 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |