Chippewa vs Vietnamese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Vietnamese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Vietnamese

Fair
Fair
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,448
SOCIAL INDEX
22.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
257th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Vietnamese Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,854,119 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Vietnamese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 17.2 Vietnamese.
Chippewa Integration in Vietnamese Communities

Chippewa vs Vietnamese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $56,127, a difference of 19.4%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 18.9%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $82,248, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $56,143, a difference of 4.3%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $96,123, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $93,788, a difference of 11.7%).
Chippewa vs Vietnamese Income
Income MetricChippewaVietnamese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Poor
$42,368
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Tragic
$96,123
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Poor
$82,248
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Average
$46,172
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Poor
$52,525
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Excellent
$40,377
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Exceptional
$56,127
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Fair
$92,089
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Tragic
$93,788
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Tragic
$56,143
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Exceptional
21.0%

Chippewa vs Vietnamese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 36.5%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 29.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.3%), female poverty (16.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and poverty (15.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 4.6%).
Chippewa vs Vietnamese Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaVietnamese
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
15.0%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
11.5%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
21.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Tragic
19.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
19.5%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
7.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
15.7%

Chippewa vs Vietnamese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 52.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), male unemployment (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Chippewa vs Vietnamese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaVietnamese
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
14.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Tragic
21.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
8.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.5%

Chippewa vs Vietnamese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 48.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.74%).
Chippewa vs Vietnamese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaVietnamese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Tragic
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Tragic
29.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Tragic
70.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
82.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
80.8%

Chippewa vs Vietnamese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 51.5%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 41.2%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.2% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 1.8%), family households (62.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and married-couple households (42.1% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
Chippewa vs Vietnamese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaVietnamese
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Average
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
43.6%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.37
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Poor
6.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Excellent
30.2%

Chippewa vs Vietnamese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 177.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 95.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 72.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 22.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 48.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 72.9%).
Chippewa vs Vietnamese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaVietnamese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
26.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
73.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
38.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
12.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
3.9%

Chippewa vs Vietnamese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 94.2%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 38.1%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 1.5%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Chippewa vs Vietnamese Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaVietnamese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
3.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
93.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
93.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
92.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
90.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
89.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Tragic
87.9%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Tragic
85.4%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
81.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
61.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Tragic
57.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Excellent
15.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Average
1.9%

Chippewa vs Vietnamese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.81%, a difference of 131.5%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 67.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
Chippewa vs Vietnamese Disability
Disability MetricChippewaVietnamese
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
0.81%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Good
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
2.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%