Chippewa vs South American Indian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
South American Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

South American Indians

Fair
Average
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,820
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
193rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

South American Indian Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,887,891 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.917. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.036% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 1,035.8 South American Indians.
Chippewa Integration in South American Indian Communities

Chippewa vs South American Indian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $87,446, a difference of 24.0%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $44,206, a difference of 20.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $96,497, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 0.93%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $52,979, a difference of 12.7%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $40,019, a difference of 14.3%).
Chippewa vs South American Indian Income
Income MetricChippewaSouth American Indian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Good
$44,206
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Good
$103,624
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Excellent
$87,446
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Good
$46,952
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Average
$54,508
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Good
$40,019
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Excellent
$52,979
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Good
$96,497
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Good
$101,171
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Good
$62,215
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Exceptional
24.7%

Chippewa vs South American Indian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 35.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 34.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.2%).
Chippewa vs South American Indian Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaSouth American Indian
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Fair
12.7%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Fair
9.1%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Fair
11.5%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Average
20.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Average
17.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Average
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Average
29.3%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Average
11.9%

Chippewa vs South American Indian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 68.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 39.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.9%).
Chippewa vs South American Indian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaSouth American Indian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Fair
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Fair
5.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Fair
5.5%

Chippewa vs South American Indian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 22.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Chippewa vs South American Indian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaSouth American Indian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Good
82.9%

Chippewa vs South American Indian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.4%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 34.3%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.0%), family households (62.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.6%).
Chippewa vs South American Indian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaSouth American Indian
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.26
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Excellent
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Poor
45.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Average
31.7%

Chippewa vs South American Indian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 27.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.7%).
Chippewa vs South American Indian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaSouth American Indian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
12.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
88.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Average
6.3%

Chippewa vs South American Indian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 39.2%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 37.1%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.73%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.75%).
Chippewa vs South American Indian Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaSouth American Indian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
95.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
92.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Poor
90.6%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Average
65.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Good
60.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Good
47.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Excellent
39.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Excellent
15.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Excellent
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
2.0%

Chippewa vs South American Indian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 40.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.6%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.7%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.7%).
Chippewa vs South American Indian Disability
Disability MetricChippewaSouth American Indian
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Excellent
10.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Good
23.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Excellent
2.4%