Chippewa vs Estonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,799,661 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.061. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Estonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 2.4 Estonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $51,875, a difference of 41.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $114,220, a difference of 36.1%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $95,930, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 8.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,523, a difference of 9.6%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $43,106, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 58.0%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 54.7%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 15.0%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 88.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 48.6%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.3%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.10, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.39%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 71.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 65.8%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 40.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 33.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 6.2%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.6%).