Chippewa vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,714,016 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $77,631, a difference of 10.1%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $38,391, a difference of 9.7%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $40,152, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $48,691, a difference of 3.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $56,615, a difference of 5.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $84,235, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 19.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 17.7%), and single female poverty (26.8% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.46%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 58.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.98%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.6%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 16.3%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 32.6%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 29.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 40.7%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 24.7%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.81%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 43.8%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 38.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.48%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.3%).