Chippewa vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,722,762 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 9.2 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $33,921, a difference of 8.0%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $82,386, a difference of 5.4%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $67,792, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $35,063, a difference of 0.17%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $46,417, a difference of 1.3%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $45,566, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 59.9%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 41.1%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 10.2%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 50.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 34.6%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.20 compared to 3.52, a difference of 9.8%), single father households (3.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.56%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 8.2%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.0%), 7th grade (97.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.1%), male disability (14.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and disability (14.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 2.7%).