Chippewa vs Danish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Danish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Danes

Fair
Excellent
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,781
SOCIAL INDEX
85.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
48th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Danish Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,394,992 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Danes within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.105. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Danes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 7.7 Danes.
Chippewa Integration in Danish Communities

Chippewa vs Danish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Danish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $105,619, a difference of 25.8%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $87,676, a difference of 24.3%), and wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $37,730, a difference of 7.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $53,041, a difference of 12.8%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $46,392, a difference of 15.1%).
Chippewa vs Danish Income
Income MetricChippewaDanish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Good
$44,095
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Excellent
$105,900
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Excellent
$87,676
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Average
$46,392
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Excellent
$56,246
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Tragic
$37,730
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Excellent
$53,041
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Excellent
$97,221
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Exceptional
$105,619
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Exceptional
$63,117
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Tragic
31.0%

Chippewa vs Danish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Danish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 62.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 56.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 19.2%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 22.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 27.7%).
Chippewa vs Danish Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaDanish
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Average
12.8%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
8.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.0%

Chippewa vs Danish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Danish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 86.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 56.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.6%).
Chippewa vs Danish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaDanish
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Exceptional
15.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.5%

Chippewa vs Danish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Danish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 2.1%).
Chippewa vs Danish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaDanish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Good
65.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Exceptional
44.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
83.3%

Chippewa vs Danish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Danish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 48.6%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 44.2%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.83%), family households (62.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 7.5%).
Chippewa vs Danish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaDanish
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
66.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
28.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Exceptional
51.1%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
50.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Exceptional
28.7%

Chippewa vs Danish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Danish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 43.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 14.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.2%).
Chippewa vs Danish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaDanish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
93.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
63.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
24.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
8.6%

Chippewa vs Danish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Danish communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.4%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 25.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (97.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.070%), 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
Chippewa vs Danish Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaDanish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
93.5%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Exceptional
91.8%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Exceptional
88.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
68.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Exceptional
61.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Good
47.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Average
38.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Chippewa vs Danish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Danish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.3%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.8%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 12.3%).
Chippewa vs Danish Disability
Disability MetricChippewaDanish
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Excellent
22.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%