Chippewa vs Armenian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Armenian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Armenians
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,687
SOCIAL INDEX
54.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
170th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Armenian Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,832,290 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Armenians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Armenians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Armenians.
Chippewa vs Armenian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $48,287, a difference of 31.8%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $91,807, a difference of 30.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $103,248, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 0.79%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $53,179, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,656, a difference of 14.5%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Armenian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Exceptional $48,287 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Exceptional $109,692 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Exceptional $91,807 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Exceptional $49,804 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Exceptional $58,134 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Exceptional $42,212 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Exceptional $53,179 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Exceptional $103,248 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Exceptional $107,002 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Good $61,656 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Exceptional 24.8% |
Chippewa vs Armenian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 48.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 47.7%), and single female poverty (26.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 8.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Armenian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Good 12.1% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Excellent 8.5% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Good 13.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 18.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Excellent 15.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Excellent 11.1% |
Chippewa vs Armenian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 84.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 39.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.80%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Armenian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.0% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 11.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Chippewa vs Armenian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 33.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Armenian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Fair 64.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Tragic 32.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Tragic 72.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Fair 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Fair 82.5% |
Chippewa vs Armenian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 62.6%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 52.4%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Armenian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Average 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Good 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Average 46.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Exceptional 26.2% |
Chippewa vs Armenian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Armenian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Excellent 56.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Good 19.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Excellent 6.6% |
Chippewa vs Armenian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 54.0%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 50.3%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.96%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.98%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Armenian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 95.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 94.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Tragic 92.7% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Tragic 91.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Poor 90.6% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Good 86.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 68.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Exceptional 63.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 42.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chippewa vs Armenian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 82.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 54.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 54.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.5%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Armenian |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.0% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 24.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 50.0% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Average 3.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.4% |