Chippewa vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from Guatemala
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from Guatemala
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,578,724 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.115. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 2.5 Immigrants from Guatemala.
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Guatemala Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 11.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,447, a difference of 9.4%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $75,123, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $53,950, a difference of 0.19%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $46,244, a difference of 0.27%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $87,191, a difference of 0.39%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Tragic $37,550 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Tragic $87,191 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Tragic $75,123 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Tragic $40,851 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Tragic $46,244 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Tragic $35,444 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Poor $51,447 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Tragic $81,341 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Tragic $86,573 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Tragic $53,950 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Guatemala Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 32.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 24.2%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.22%), poverty (15.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 15.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 12.0% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 16.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 21.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 21.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 24.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 33.3% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.6% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Guatemala Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 54.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Poor 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Good 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 8.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Guatemala Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 24.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.84%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Guatemala |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Tragic 35.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 81.1% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Guatemala Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 13.7%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 28.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Tragic 42.8% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.41 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Tragic 42.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 37.5% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Guatemala Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 18.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 9.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Guatemala |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 11.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Tragic 88.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 53.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Good 19.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Guatemala Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 118.7%), college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and high school diploma (89.7% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 0.65%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Guatemala |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 3.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 95.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 95.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 94.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 93.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 91.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 90.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 89.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Tragic 87.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Tragic 85.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 84.0% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Tragic 81.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 77.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 56.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 50.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 38.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 30.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Guatemala Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 53.5%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 43.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Poor 11.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 49.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 17.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |