Chippewa vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,318,854 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.248. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 11.0 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,022, a difference of 8.5%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $74,217, a difference of 5.2%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $34,974, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $80,012, a difference of 0.010%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $53,420, a difference of 0.80%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $39,762, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 36.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 28.3%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.67%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and poverty (15.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 50.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 25.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 15.8%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and family households (62.1% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.94%), currently married (43.2% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 12.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 121.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 28.5%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 53.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.9%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.38%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.9%).