Chippewa vs Cambodian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cambodian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Cambodians

Fair
Exceptional
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,346
SOCIAL INDEX
90.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
19th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cambodian Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,970,841 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.097. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 1.6 Cambodians.
Chippewa Integration in Cambodian Communities

Chippewa vs Cambodian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $51,731, a difference of 41.2%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $96,324, a difference of 36.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $114,342, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $55,571, a difference of 18.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $66,892, a difference of 24.2%).
Chippewa vs Cambodian Income
Income MetricChippewaCambodian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Exceptional
$51,731
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Exceptional
$117,780
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Exceptional
$96,324
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Exceptional
$53,386
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Exceptional
$62,516
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Exceptional
$45,014
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Exceptional
$55,571
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Exceptional
$107,148
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Exceptional
$114,342
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Exceptional
$66,892
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Average
25.8%

Chippewa vs Cambodian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 62.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 54.1%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.4%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.4%).
Chippewa vs Cambodian Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaCambodian
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Exceptional
14.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Fair
16.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
27.0%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.5%

Chippewa vs Cambodian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 126.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 61.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.9%).
Chippewa vs Cambodian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaCambodian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.8%

Chippewa vs Cambodian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 18.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
Chippewa vs Cambodian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaCambodian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Exceptional
67.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
81.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Good
37.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
86.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
84.1%

Chippewa vs Cambodian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 59.8%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.9%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 0.75%), family households (62.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.5%).
Chippewa vs Cambodian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaCambodian
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
61.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Exceptional
26.7%

Chippewa vs Cambodian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 37.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 21.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.4%).
Chippewa vs Cambodian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaCambodian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
53.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
5.5%

Chippewa vs Cambodian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 75.1%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 72.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 68.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.37%).
Chippewa vs Cambodian Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaCambodian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Exceptional
88.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
47.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
20.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

Chippewa vs Cambodian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 62.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 52.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.4%).
Chippewa vs Cambodian Disability
Disability MetricChippewaCambodian
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
21.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Fair
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%