Chippewa vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
White/Caucasian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Whites/Caucasians
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,140
SOCIAL INDEX
48.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
185th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
White/Caucasian Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,062,039 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.953. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.928% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 928.3 Whites/Caucasians.
Chippewa vs White/Caucasian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $98,091, a difference of 16.9%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $53,925, a difference of 16.3%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $82,029, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $50,336, a difference of 7.1%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $37,531, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $58,847, a difference of 9.3%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | White/Caucasian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Poor $42,180 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Poor $99,800 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Poor $82,029 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Poor $45,197 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Fair $53,925 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Tragic $37,531 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Tragic $50,336 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Poor $91,668 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Fair $98,091 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Tragic $58,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 28.5% |
Chippewa vs White/Caucasian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 32.7%), male poverty (14.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 31.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 2.5%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | White/Caucasian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Poor 18.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Average 16.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Average 16.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 18.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Excellent 11.1% |
Chippewa vs White/Caucasian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 59.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 36.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | White/Caucasian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Poor 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 8.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Excellent 5.3% |
Chippewa vs White/Caucasian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.76%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | White/Caucasian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 78.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 41.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
Chippewa vs White/Caucasian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.6%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | White/Caucasian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 65.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Poor 33.3% |
Chippewa vs White/Caucasian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 34.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 2.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 4.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | White/Caucasian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 7.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 93.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 60.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Chippewa vs White/Caucasian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 21.0%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | White/Caucasian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 93.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Exceptional 90.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Good 86.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Poor 64.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 57.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 44.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 35.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Chippewa vs White/Caucasian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 18.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.3%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.4%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | White/Caucasian |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.0% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Average 47.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |