Chippewa vs Kiowa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,564,089 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.387% in Kiowa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 387.3 Kiowa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $74,815, a difference of 12.2%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $80,885, a difference of 7.4%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $65,914, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,287 compared to $39,232, a difference of 2.7%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $34,074, a difference of 2.7%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $45,094, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.2%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 19.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (26.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 65.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 40.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 11.7%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.2% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 0.19%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and family households (62.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 22.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 12.5%), associate's degree (40.7% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 11.7%), and college, 1 year or more (55.7% compared to 51.0%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 33.4%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.4%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and male disability (14.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.1%).