Chippewa vs Hispanic or Latino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,809,261 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Hispanics or Latinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 59.0 Hispanics or Latinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $50,279, a difference of 6.9%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $73,823, a difference of 4.7%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $35,688, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,287 compared to $40,288, a difference of 0.0%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $46,419, a difference of 0.11%), and wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 37.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 26.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.26%), female poverty (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 47.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.41%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 26.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 12.9%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.81%), currently married (43.2% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.35%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 85.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 43.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 31.9%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.0%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.2%).