Chippewa vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,651,003 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.943. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 3.9 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $49,173, a difference of 34.2%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $93,971, a difference of 33.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $111,602, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $52,540, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $65,326, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 45.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 40.7%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 105.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 24.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 52.7%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.070%), family households (62.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 38.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 81.0%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 76.9%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 69.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.22%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 64.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 47.8%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.1%).