Chippewa vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,273,513 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.619. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Southern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 4.0 Immigrants from Southern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $48,027, a difference of 31.1%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $91,605, a difference of 29.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $103,486, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.8%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,902, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $54,484, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 45.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 42.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 77.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 39.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 20.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.4%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 37.2%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.75%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.76%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 37.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 32.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 45.5%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 45.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.45%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 39.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.8%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.0%).