Chippewa vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,543,547 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.102. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $49,448, a difference of 35.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $112,484, a difference of 34.0%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $93,852, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $53,552, a difference of 13.9%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $42,108, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 56.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 54.1%), and male poverty (14.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 23.4%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 72.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 46.8%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 46.5%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.62%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.10, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.7%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 55.4%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 55.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 38.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 30.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 7.4%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.4%).