Chippewa vs Yuman Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yuman
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Yuman

Fair
Tragic
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
959
SOCIAL INDEX
7.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
331st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yuman Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,507,338 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yuman within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Yuman. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 0.4 Yuman.
Chippewa Integration in Yuman Communities

Chippewa vs Yuman Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($86,852 compared to $78,055, a difference of 11.3%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $33,236, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $72,956, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $35,377, a difference of 1.1%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $53,110, a difference of 1.4%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $39,523, a difference of 1.9%).
Chippewa vs Yuman Income
Income MetricChippewaYuman
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Tragic
$33,236
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Tragic
$78,055
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Tragic
$68,743
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Tragic
$39,523
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Tragic
$45,446
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Tragic
$35,377
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Tragic
$50,933
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Tragic
$72,956
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Tragic
$82,139
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Tragic
$53,110
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Exceptional
23.3%

Chippewa vs Yuman Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 79.0%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 50.9%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 8.6%).
Chippewa vs Yuman Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaYuman
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
20.2%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
16.6%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
19.5%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
24.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
22.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
28.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
30.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
27.1%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
21.3%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
29.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
37.8%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
9.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
15.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
20.2%

Chippewa vs Yuman Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 171.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 108.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 73.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.6%).
Chippewa vs Yuman Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaYuman
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
9.1%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
8.6%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
9.6%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
16.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Tragic
37.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
11.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
9.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
14.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
9.8%

Chippewa vs Yuman Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 58.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 70.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.1%).
Chippewa vs Yuman Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaYuman
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Tragic
57.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Tragic
71.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Tragic
27.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Tragic
70.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
76.3%

Chippewa vs Yuman Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 20.8%), family households (62.1% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 4.1%).
Chippewa vs Yuman Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaYuman
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
43.3%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.47
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
9.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
42.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Tragic
44.4%

Chippewa vs Yuman Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 57.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 6.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 10.5%).
Chippewa vs Yuman Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaYuman
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
14.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
85.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
51.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Good
19.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Good
6.5%

Chippewa vs Yuman Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 51.9%), associate's degree (40.7% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 30.3%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.55%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.65%).
Chippewa vs Yuman Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaYuman
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
93.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
92.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
89.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Tragic
86.5%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Tragic
84.0%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
79.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
55.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Tragic
48.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Tragic
31.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Chippewa vs Yuman Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 98.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.1%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.060%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and male disability (14.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Chippewa vs Yuman Disability
Disability MetricChippewaYuman
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
14.6%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
14.7%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
14.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
31.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
54.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%