Chippewa vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,530,773 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.074% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 74.2 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $57,953, a difference of 58.2%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $67,634, a difference of 45.9%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $126,620, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 13.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $56,660, a difference of 20.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $69,164, a difference of 28.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 60.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 59.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.4%), and single father poverty (18.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 97.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 25.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 60.1%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 56.7%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 46.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 99.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 83.8%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 82.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 61.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 54.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.5%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.7%).