Chippewa vs Thai Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Thai
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Thais
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,191
SOCIAL INDEX
99.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
2nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Thai Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,408,947 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Thais within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.173. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Thais. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 3.4 Thais.
Chippewa vs Thai Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Thai communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $110,648, a difference of 56.9%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $72,135, a difference of 55.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $129,560, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 22.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $59,187, a difference of 25.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $72,099, a difference of 33.9%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Thai |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Exceptional $54,307 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Exceptional $131,281 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Exceptional $110,648 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Exceptional $59,237 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Exceptional $72,135 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Exceptional $47,577 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Exceptional $59,187 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Exceptional $121,778 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Exceptional $129,560 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Exceptional $72,099 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 30.5% |
Chippewa vs Thai Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Thai communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 90.1%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 80.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 79.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 19.4%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 29.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 31.6%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Thai |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 17.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 24.5% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Chippewa vs Thai Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Thai communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 110.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 64.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Thai |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Chippewa vs Thai Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Thai communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 26.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Thai |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Exceptional 67.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Exceptional 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Tragic 34.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Tragic 74.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Exceptional 84.3% |
Chippewa vs Thai Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Thai communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 77.4%), single father households (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 60.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.64%), family households (62.1% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 14.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Thai |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 67.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 30.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Exceptional 51.9% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Fair 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 50.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Exceptional 24.0% |
Chippewa vs Thai Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Thai communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.3%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 8.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Thai |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 57.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Good 19.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Fair 6.2% |
Chippewa vs Thai Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Thai communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 90.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 81.4%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 77.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Thai |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 94.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 93.2% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Exceptional 91.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Exceptional 89.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 73.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Exceptional 68.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Exceptional 57.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 50.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Chippewa vs Thai Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Thai communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 77.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 74.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 6.7%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.1%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Thai |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Exceptional 20.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 45.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.1% |