Chippewa vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Puget Sound Salish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Puget Sound Salish

Fair
Average
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,672
SOCIAL INDEX
54.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
172nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Puget Sound Salish Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,973,014 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 15.3 Puget Sound Salish.
Chippewa Integration in Puget Sound Salish Communities

Chippewa vs Puget Sound Salish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $84,011, a difference of 19.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $55,543, a difference of 18.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $98,340, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $59,934, a difference of 11.3%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $39,376, a difference of 12.5%).
Chippewa vs Puget Sound Salish Income
Income MetricChippewaPuget Sound Salish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Tragic
$41,495
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Tragic
$97,958
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Fair
$84,011
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Average
$46,333
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Fair
$53,704
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Fair
$39,376
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Exceptional
$55,543
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Fair
$93,661
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Fair
$98,340
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Fair
$59,934
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Good
25.3%

Chippewa vs Puget Sound Salish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 46.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 44.1%), and male poverty (14.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.5%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 19.5%).
Chippewa vs Puget Sound Salish Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaPuget Sound Salish
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Excellent
8.4%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
18.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Excellent
15.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Good
15.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Average
12.8%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
13.1%

Chippewa vs Puget Sound Salish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 74.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 52.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.9%).
Chippewa vs Puget Sound Salish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaPuget Sound Salish
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Average
5.2%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
10.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.1%

Chippewa vs Puget Sound Salish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.58%).
Chippewa vs Puget Sound Salish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaPuget Sound Salish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Tragic
63.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Tragic
78.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
81.7%

Chippewa vs Puget Sound Salish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 40.1%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.5%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.97%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Chippewa vs Puget Sound Salish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaPuget Sound Salish
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
65.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Exceptional
47.4%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
47.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Excellent
30.4%

Chippewa vs Puget Sound Salish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 24.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 22.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.16%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.82%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 8.5%).
Chippewa vs Puget Sound Salish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaPuget Sound Salish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
90.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
62.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
26.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
9.4%

Chippewa vs Puget Sound Salish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 26.8%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 12.6%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.0%), 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.12%).
Chippewa vs Puget Sound Salish Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaPuget Sound Salish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
92.0%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Excellent
89.9%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Tragic
55.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Tragic
40.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
30.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.2%

Chippewa vs Puget Sound Salish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 93.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.83%), female disability (14.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Chippewa vs Puget Sound Salish Disability
Disability MetricChippewaPuget Sound Salish
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
13.7%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
0.97%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
8.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
27.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
49.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.8%