Chippewa vs Celtic Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Celtic
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Celtics
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Celtic Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,148,600 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.559. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 7.1 Celtics.
Chippewa vs Celtic Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $43,621, a difference of 19.1%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $83,193, a difference of 17.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $98,896, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $50,447, a difference of 7.3%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $38,283, a difference of 9.4%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Celtic |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Average $43,621 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Fair $101,139 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Fair $83,193 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Fair $45,732 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Average $54,242 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Tragic $38,283 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Tragic $50,447 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Fair $92,241 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Fair $98,896 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Average $60,608 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 27.3% |
Chippewa vs Celtic Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 34.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 30.7%), and male poverty (14.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.8%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 12.4%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 13.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Celtic |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 21.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 14.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Poor 17.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Fair 16.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Average 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Fair 17.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 30.9% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Excellent 10.9% |
Chippewa vs Celtic Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 60.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Celtic |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Good 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 8.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Good 5.4% |
Chippewa vs Celtic Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Celtic |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Tragic 63.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 41.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 81.8% |
Chippewa vs Celtic Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.8%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.0%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.42%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (62.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Celtic |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 63.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Excellent 47.3% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Poor 33.3% |
Chippewa vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 17.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.67%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Celtic |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 8.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 92.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Chippewa vs Celtic Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 29.2%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.6%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Celtic |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 93.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Exceptional 90.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Exceptional 86.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Good 65.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Average 14.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.9% |
Chippewa vs Celtic Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.4%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Celtic |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 13.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Average 47.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Good 17.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |