Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Czechoslovakian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Czechoslovakians
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czechoslovakian Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,450,430 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 10.4 Czechoslovakians.
Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $101,387, a difference of 20.8%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $84,965, a difference of 20.4%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $43,806, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,224, a difference of 8.9%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $38,738, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $60,581, a difference of 12.5%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Czechoslovakian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Average $43,806 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Average $103,273 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Average $84,965 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Average $46,658 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Good $55,382 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Poor $38,738 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Tragic $51,224 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Average $95,070 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Good $101,387 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Average $60,581 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 28.2% |
Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 42.7%), male poverty (14.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 41.1%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.2%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 16.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 19.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Czechoslovakian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Good 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Fair 13.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Good 16.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Fair 21.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 73.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 43.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Czechoslovakian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Czechoslovakian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Tragic 64.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 41.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Exceptional 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Good 83.0% |
Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 35.6%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.1%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Czechoslovakian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Excellent 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Poor 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Fair 32.0% |
Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.95%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 4.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Czechoslovakian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 59.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.1%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.3%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Czechoslovakian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 95.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Exceptional 87.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Good 65.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Average 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 14.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 26.9%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 24.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.0%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.0%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Czechoslovakian |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 46.6% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Average 2.5% |