Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Czechoslovakians

Fair
Good
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czechoslovakian Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,450,430 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 10.4 Czechoslovakians.
Chippewa Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $101,387, a difference of 20.8%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $84,965, a difference of 20.4%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $43,806, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,224, a difference of 8.9%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $38,738, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $60,581, a difference of 12.5%).
Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Income
Income MetricChippewaCzechoslovakian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Average
$43,806
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Average
$103,273
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Average
$84,965
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Average
$46,658
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Good
$55,382
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Poor
$38,738
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Tragic
$51,224
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Average
$95,070
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Good
$101,387
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Average
$60,581
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Tragic
28.2%

Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 42.7%), male poverty (14.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 41.1%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.2%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 16.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 19.7%).
Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaCzechoslovakian
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Good
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Good
16.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.3%

Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 73.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 43.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.0%).
Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaCzechoslovakian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.1%

Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaCzechoslovakian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Average
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Exceptional
41.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Good
83.0%

Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 35.6%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.1%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.1%).
Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaCzechoslovakian
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Fair
32.0%

Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.95%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 4.6%).
Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaCzechoslovakian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.1%

Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.1%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.3%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaCzechoslovakian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Good
65.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.8%

Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 26.9%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 24.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.0%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.0%).
Chippewa vs Czechoslovakian Disability
Disability MetricChippewaCzechoslovakian
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.5%