Chippewa vs Macedonian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Macedonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Macedonians

Fair
Excellent
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,797
SOCIAL INDEX
85.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
47th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Macedonian Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,192,141 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Macedonians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.805. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.052% in Macedonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 52.5 Macedonians.
Chippewa Integration in Macedonian Communities

Chippewa vs Macedonian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $47,573, a difference of 29.9%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $90,761, a difference of 28.7%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $59,522, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,564, a difference of 14.3%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $54,563, a difference of 16.1%).
Chippewa vs Macedonian Income
Income MetricChippewaMacedonian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Exceptional
$47,573
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Exceptional
$109,668
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Exceptional
$90,761
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Exceptional
$49,893
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Exceptional
$59,522
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Exceptional
$41,286
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Exceptional
$54,563
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Exceptional
$101,882
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Exceptional
$107,074
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Good
$61,564
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Tragic
28.6%

Chippewa vs Macedonian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 50.9%), male poverty (14.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 49.9%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.6%).
Chippewa vs Macedonian Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaMacedonian
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
18.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
11.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
14.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
18.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
9.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.9%

Chippewa vs Macedonian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 86.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 41.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.3%).
Chippewa vs Macedonian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaMacedonian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
5.3%

Chippewa vs Macedonian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Chippewa vs Macedonian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaMacedonian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Exceptional
37.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
83.5%

Chippewa vs Macedonian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 54.6%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 53.0%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (62.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
Chippewa vs Macedonian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaMacedonian
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Exceptional
47.6%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Exceptional
27.9%

Chippewa vs Macedonian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 37.6%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 28.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 21.4%).
Chippewa vs Macedonian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaMacedonian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
12.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
87.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
53.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
17.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
5.5%

Chippewa vs Macedonian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 46.3%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 37.1%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.14%), 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%).
Chippewa vs Macedonian Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaMacedonian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Exceptional
61.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Exceptional
49.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
41.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Excellent
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Chippewa vs Macedonian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 50.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 43.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 6.7%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.8%).
Chippewa vs Macedonian Disability
Disability MetricChippewaMacedonian
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
21.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%