Chippewa vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,305,446 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.307. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.129% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 129.1 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 11.7%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $77,559, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $91,293, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $47,916, a difference of 1.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $82,254, a difference of 2.8%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $49,201, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 28.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 21.6%), and single female poverty (26.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.81%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 65.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.2%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 22.0%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 0.31%), currently married (43.2% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and married-couple households (42.1% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 18.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.89%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 47.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 27.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 56.3%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 44.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.3%).