Chippewa vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 191,517,141 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.200. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $88,976, a difference of 26.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $105,309, a difference of 25.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $99,429, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 9.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,440, a difference of 14.1%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $40,177, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 46.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 41.6%), and male poverty (14.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.2%), and single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 66.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 31.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 26.1%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 25.0%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (62.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.98%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 22.0%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.69%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.9%).