Chippewa vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,581,052 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 2.5 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $64,920, a difference of 20.6%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $84,729, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $98,778, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 0.39%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $37,497, a difference of 7.1%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $39,403, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 38.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 34.6%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.8%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 63.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 37.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 28.4%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.9%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.41, a difference of 6.5%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 18.1%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.7% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.19%), ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and associate's degree (40.7% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 54.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.8%).