Chippewa vs Swedish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Swedish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Swedes

Fair
Excellent
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,881
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
41st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Swedish Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,161,159 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Swedes within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.528. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.048% in Swedes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 47.8 Swedes.
Chippewa Integration in Swedish Communities

Chippewa vs Swedish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $106,377, a difference of 26.7%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $88,524, a difference of 25.5%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $108,499, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $39,421, a difference of 12.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $52,986, a difference of 12.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $62,736, a difference of 16.5%).
Chippewa vs Swedish Income
Income MetricChippewaSwedish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Exceptional
$45,750
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Exceptional
$108,499
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Exceptional
$88,524
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Excellent
$47,851
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Exceptional
$57,445
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Fair
$39,421
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Excellent
$52,986
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Exceptional
$99,136
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Exceptional
$106,377
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Excellent
$62,736
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Tragic
29.4%

Chippewa vs Swedish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 59.6%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 57.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 56.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 15.4%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 25.2%).
Chippewa vs Swedish Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaSwedish
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Average
20.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Exceptional
15.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Excellent
28.4%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
8.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.2%

Chippewa vs Swedish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 80.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 51.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.9%).
Chippewa vs Swedish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaSwedish
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Exceptional
15.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.7%

Chippewa vs Swedish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Chippewa vs Swedish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaSwedish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Exceptional
44.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
78.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
83.7%

Chippewa vs Swedish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 45.2%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 43.8%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.10, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.9%).
Chippewa vs Swedish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaSwedish
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Exceptional
49.7%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
50.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Exceptional
29.6%

Chippewa vs Swedish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 39.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.62%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 6.8%).
Chippewa vs Swedish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaSwedish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
6.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
61.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.6%

Chippewa vs Swedish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 33.5%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.16%).
Chippewa vs Swedish Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaSwedish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
97.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
94.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
93.7%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Exceptional
92.2%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Exceptional
88.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
68.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Exceptional
48.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Good
39.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Good
15.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
2.0%

Chippewa vs Swedish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 30.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 24.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 6.0%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 10.6%).
Chippewa vs Swedish Disability
Disability MetricChippewaSwedish
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%