Chippewa vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,281,013 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.751. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.366% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 366.4 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $87,553, a difference of 24.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $103,584, a difference of 23.4%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $45,043, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 0.18%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $52,374, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,976, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 33.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 32.0%), and single female poverty (26.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 79.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 49.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 39.7%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.1%), family households (62.1% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 27.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.68%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 45.7%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 45.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.59%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 63.4%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 39.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.9%).