Chippewa vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,679,762 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.434. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 10.4 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $86,498, a difference of 22.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $65,427, a difference of 21.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $101,580, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.0%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $37,498, a difference of 7.1%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $39,826, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 42.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 41.6%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 17.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 67.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 30.7%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.0%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.42, a difference of 6.8%), currently married (43.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and family households (62.1% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 21.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 38.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.26%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 56.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.6%).