Chippewa vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,396,342 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.256. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 8.8 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $90,026, a difference of 27.6%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $46,531, a difference of 27.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $105,430, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 1.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $53,185, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $62,522, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 43.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 43.0%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 79.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 50.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 21.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 44.5%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.4%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.71%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.0%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 33.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 49.5%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 45.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.20%), high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 61.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 46.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.6%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.6%).