Chippewa vs Finnish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,967,225 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Finns within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.102. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 16.0 Finns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $99,904, a difference of 19.0%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $43,461, a difference of 18.6%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $83,607, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $38,173, a difference of 9.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,827, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $59,535, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 45.4%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 44.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 11.0%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 16.0%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 66.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 42.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 40.6%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 34.7%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.50%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.09, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 24.0%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 23.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 21.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.5%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.1%).