Chippewa vs Uruguayan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Uruguayan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Uruguayans
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,949
SOCIAL INDEX
47.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
188th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Uruguayan Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,008,214 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.500. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 47.4 Uruguayans.
Chippewa vs Uruguayan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $44,318, a difference of 21.0%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $84,691, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $98,660, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 0.71%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $59,090, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $52,465, a difference of 11.6%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Uruguayan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Good $44,318 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Fair $100,656 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Average $84,691 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Average $46,190 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Fair $53,680 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Fair $39,228 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Good $52,465 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Fair $93,631 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Fair $98,660 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Poor $59,090 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Excellent 25.2% |
Chippewa vs Uruguayan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 37.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 37.3%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.33%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 3.6%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Uruguayan |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Average 12.4% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Fair 9.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Fair 13.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Good 13.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Good 17.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Average 16.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Good 16.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 20.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 28.3% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Average 11.8% |
Chippewa vs Uruguayan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 77.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 50.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Uruguayan |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Chippewa vs Uruguayan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 25.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Uruguayan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Exceptional 65.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Poor 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Good 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Excellent 83.1% |
Chippewa vs Uruguayan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.2%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 28.8%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Uruguayan |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Poor 45.5% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Poor 6.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Tragic 45.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Poor 33.1% |
Chippewa vs Uruguayan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 19.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Uruguayan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 11.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Tragic 88.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 52.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 17.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Chippewa vs Uruguayan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 36.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 33.6%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.74%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.75%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Uruguayan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 95.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 94.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Tragic 92.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 90.4% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Tragic 88.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Poor 85.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Poor 64.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Fair 58.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Average 46.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Good 38.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Excellent 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Chippewa vs Uruguayan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 54.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 46.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.7%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.3%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Uruguayan |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Exceptional 22.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |