Chippewa vs Sudanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Sudanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Sudanese

Fair
Average
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,867
SOCIAL INDEX
46.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
190th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Sudanese Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,039,489 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.461. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Sudanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 36.4 Sudanese.
Chippewa Integration in Sudanese Communities

Chippewa vs Sudanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $41,695, a difference of 13.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $93,718, a difference of 11.6%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $96,783, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $46,982, a difference of 0.070%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $84,401, a difference of 5.5%).
Chippewa vs Sudanese Income
Income MetricChippewaSudanese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Tragic
$41,695
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Tragic
$96,783
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Tragic
$78,529
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Tragic
$44,419
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Tragic
$51,216
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Tragic
$38,215
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Tragic
$46,982
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Tragic
$84,401
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Tragic
$93,718
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Tragic
$58,281
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Exceptional
24.0%

Chippewa vs Sudanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 25.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.2%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.4%), female poverty (16.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 10.8%).
Chippewa vs Sudanese Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaSudanese
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
10.0%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
23.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Tragic
19.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
18.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
18.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
30.0%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Fair
12.0%

Chippewa vs Sudanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 71.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 69.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 22.1%).
Chippewa vs Sudanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaSudanese
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Exceptional
15.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
5.3%

Chippewa vs Sudanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 2.2%).
Chippewa vs Sudanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaSudanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Exceptional
68.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Exceptional
42.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Excellent
83.0%

Chippewa vs Sudanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 31.6%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.8%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.0%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 0.98%).
Chippewa vs Sudanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaSudanese
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
60.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
42.1%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
43.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Fair
32.4%

Chippewa vs Sudanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 20.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.41%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 6.7%).
Chippewa vs Sudanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaSudanese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
53.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
5.6%

Chippewa vs Sudanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 37.2%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.38%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.70%).
Chippewa vs Sudanese Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaSudanese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Average
92.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Good
66.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Good
60.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Good
47.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Good
38.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Excellent
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

Chippewa vs Sudanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 65.6%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and female disability (14.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 16.2%).
Chippewa vs Sudanese Disability
Disability MetricChippewaSudanese
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Good
11.5%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Good
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Fair
47.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%