Chippewa vs Asian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Asian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Asians
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,712
SOCIAL INDEX
84.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
56th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Asian Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,401,495 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.153. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 8.2 Asians.
Chippewa vs Asian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Asian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $101,681, a difference of 44.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $118,426, a difference of 41.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $112,666, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 7.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $57,003, a difference of 21.2%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $44,586, a difference of 27.4%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Asian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Exceptional $50,057 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Exceptional $119,955 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Exceptional $101,681 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Exceptional $53,690 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Exceptional $63,827 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Exceptional $44,586 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Exceptional $57,003 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Exceptional $112,666 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Exceptional $118,426 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Exceptional $68,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 26.9% |
Chippewa vs Asian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Asian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 67.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 57.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Asian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Exceptional 14.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Exceptional 13.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 26.0% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Excellent 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Chippewa vs Asian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 99.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 51.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Asian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Good 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Chippewa vs Asian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 28.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Asian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Chippewa vs Asian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Asian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 59.2%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 47.2%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.28, a difference of 2.5%), family households (62.1% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 8.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Asian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 66.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 29.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.28 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Chippewa vs Asian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Asian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.0%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 0.37%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Asian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 91.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 57.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 20.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Chippewa vs Asian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Asian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 61.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 59.4%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.12%), high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.89%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Asian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 95.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 94.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Average 92.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Good 91.4% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Good 89.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Exceptional 86.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 69.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Exceptional 52.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 44.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 18.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Chippewa vs Asian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 73.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 59.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.2%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.7%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Asian |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Exceptional 21.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Excellent 46.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |