Chippewa vs Immigrants from Barbados Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Barbados
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Immigrants from Barbados

Fair
Poor
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,618
SOCIAL INDEX
13.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
295th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Barbados Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,653,587 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Barbados within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.999. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.058% in Immigrants from Barbados. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 58.1 Immigrants from Barbados.
Chippewa Integration in Immigrants from Barbados Communities

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Barbados Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 40.0%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $41,685, a difference of 19.1%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $45,816, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $53,766, a difference of 0.15%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $92,419, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $89,394, a difference of 6.5%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Barbados Income
Income MetricChippewaImmigrants from Barbados
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Tragic
$41,478
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Tragic
$92,419
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Tragic
$78,989
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Fair
$45,816
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Tragic
$50,795
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Exceptional
$41,685
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Exceptional
$53,163
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Tragic
$88,687
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Tragic
$89,394
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Tragic
$53,766
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Exceptional
17.8%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Barbados Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 28.5%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 28.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 3.5%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Barbados Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaImmigrants from Barbados
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
14.9%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
11.5%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
16.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Tragic
20.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
20.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Average
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Poor
21.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
30.2%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
16.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
16.6%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Barbados Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 65.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 33.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Barbados Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaImmigrants from Barbados
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
7.1%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Tragic
24.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.2%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Barbados Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 51.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 69.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Barbados Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaImmigrants from Barbados
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Tragic
64.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Tragic
78.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Tragic
29.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Tragic
69.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
83.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
81.3%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Barbados Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.6%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.68%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.0%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Barbados Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaImmigrants from Barbados
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
63.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
39.2%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
40.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Tragic
36.8%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Barbados Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 212.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 109.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 83.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 28.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 59.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 83.6%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Barbados Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaImmigrants from Barbados
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
29.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
70.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
35.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
11.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
3.6%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Barbados Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 62.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 25.0%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.7% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 0.57%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Barbados Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaImmigrants from Barbados
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
93.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
92.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
90.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Tragic
86.4%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
82.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Tragic
55.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Tragic
43.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Fair
14.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Chippewa vs Immigrants from Barbados Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 94.1%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 69.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.74%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.0%).
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Barbados Disability
Disability MetricChippewaImmigrants from Barbados
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
0.97%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Poor
23.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
2.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%