Chippewa vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,458,549 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $73,747, a difference of 4.5%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $38,088, a difference of 4.0%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $48,202, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.24%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $47,518, a difference of 1.1%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $35,661, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 11.2%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.52%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 65.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 51.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.0%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 16.1%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.6%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.5%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.87%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 51.3%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.20%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and female disability (14.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 1.3%).