Chippewa vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,476,952 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.177. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 2.9 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $52,649, a difference of 43.7%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $120,301, a difference of 38.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $115,957, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 11.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $52,783, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $67,326, a difference of 25.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 61.4%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 61.0%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 14.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 20.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 97.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 55.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 54.1%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 53.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.11, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.37%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 80.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 73.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 69.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 47.1%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 43.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 7.3%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.2%).