Chippewa vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,429,026 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 12.0 Immigrants from Latin America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,387, a difference of 9.3%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $75,420, a difference of 6.9%), and wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($86,852 compared to $86,989, a difference of 0.16%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $36,823, a difference of 0.53%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $35,307, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 32.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 31.3%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.040%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 55.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 29.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 14.8%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.85%), currently married (43.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.92%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 101.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.3%), bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 53.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 43.3%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.23%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.3%).