Chippewa vs Immigrants from Scotland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,990,901 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Scotland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 2.1 Immigrants from Scotland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $49,893, a difference of 36.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $112,175, a difference of 33.6%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $94,091, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $52,638, a difference of 12.0%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 15.0%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $41,771, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 63.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 54.2%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 23.8%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 75.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 43.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.8%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 45.3%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.27%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.7%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 52.2%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 51.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Scotland communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 39.3%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 37.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 7.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 11.6%).