Chippewa vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,058,847 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.138. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 2.1 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 10.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,525, a difference of 9.6%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $75,961, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $46,736, a difference of 0.79%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $54,526, a difference of 1.3%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $88,295, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 25.2%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 54.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 23.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 14.9%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.2% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 0.75%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 111.5%), college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and high school diploma (89.7% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.010%), bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 53.5%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 42.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.8%).