Chippewa vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,133,438 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.016. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $103,071, a difference of 22.8%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $85,681, a difference of 21.5%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $44,076, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $37,904, a difference of 8.3%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,493, a difference of 9.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,621, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 51.4%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 45.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 9.0%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 17.0%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 68.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 6.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 41.7%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 39.9%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (62.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 29.2%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 29.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.7%).