Chippewa vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ghanaian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Ghanaians

Fair
Fair
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ghanaian Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,635,354 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.313. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.033% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 33.1 Ghanaians.
Chippewa Integration in Ghanaian Communities

Chippewa vs Ghanaian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $83,582, a difference of 18.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $97,277, a difference of 15.9%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $40,429, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $60,043, a difference of 11.5%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $52,594, a difference of 11.9%).
Chippewa vs Ghanaian Income
Income MetricChippewaGhanaian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Poor
$42,164
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Poor
$98,877
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Fair
$83,582
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Average
$46,440
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Poor
$52,810
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Excellent
$40,429
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Good
$52,594
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Tragic
$90,137
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Poor
$97,277
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Fair
$60,043
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Exceptional
22.3%

Chippewa vs Ghanaian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 24.8%), and single female poverty (26.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.6%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.4%).
Chippewa vs Ghanaian Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaGhanaian
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
13.9%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
10.3%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
14.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
18.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Poor
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
12.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
14.0%

Chippewa vs Ghanaian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 61.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Chippewa vs Ghanaian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaGhanaian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.1%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.2%

Chippewa vs Ghanaian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 23.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Chippewa vs Ghanaian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaGhanaian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Good
83.0%

Chippewa vs Ghanaian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.8%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 24.5%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (42.1% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 0.25%), currently married (43.2% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 0.73%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
Chippewa vs Ghanaian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaGhanaian
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
42.2%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Tragic
34.3%

Chippewa vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 74.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 44.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 8.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 31.6%).
Chippewa vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaGhanaian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
16.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
83.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
48.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
16.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
5.2%

Chippewa vs Ghanaian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 56.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 36.0%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.0%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Chippewa vs Ghanaian Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaGhanaian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
92.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Tragic
87.7%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
84.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Fair
58.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Average
1.8%

Chippewa vs Ghanaian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 56.6%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 55.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.7%).
Chippewa vs Ghanaian Disability
Disability MetricChippewaGhanaian
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Poor
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Fair
47.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.5%