Chippewa vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,996,735 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $91,541, a difference of 29.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $106,109, a difference of 26.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $100,283, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 0.70%), median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $40,558, a difference of 15.9%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $47,671, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 49.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 45.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 85.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 43.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 23.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 40.4%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.3%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.36, a difference of 4.9%), family households (62.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.86%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 77.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.3%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 63.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 43.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.49%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.2%).