Chippewa vs Pennsylvania German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,785,267 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Pennsylvania Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 7.7 Pennsylvania Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 22.9%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $50,878, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $91,956, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $34,802, a difference of 0.58%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $52,888, a difference of 1.8%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $37,842, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 31.8%), male poverty (14.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 30.5%), and poverty (15.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 4.6%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and single father poverty (18.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 37.6%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 34.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 37.2%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.3%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.19%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (62.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.62%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.7%), college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and college, 1 year or more (55.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 16.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and female disability (14.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 4.4%).