Chippewa vs Cypriot Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cypriot
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Cypriots

Fair
Excellent
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,674
SOCIAL INDEX
84.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
58th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cypriot Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,431,992 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cypriots within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Cypriots. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 35.9 Cypriots.
Chippewa Integration in Cypriot Communities

Chippewa vs Cypriot Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $54,899, a difference of 49.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $123,396, a difference of 47.0%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $127,064, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 9.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $52,209, a difference of 11.1%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $45,570, a difference of 30.2%).
Chippewa vs Cypriot Income
Income MetricChippewaCypriot
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Exceptional
$54,899
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Exceptional
$127,064
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Exceptional
$102,843
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Exceptional
$54,589
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Exceptional
$65,549
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Exceptional
$45,570
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Average
$52,209
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Exceptional
$116,364
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Exceptional
$123,396
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Exceptional
$71,714
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Tragic
27.3%

Chippewa vs Cypriot Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 67.6%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 65.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.7%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 18.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 19.0%).
Chippewa vs Cypriot Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaCypriot
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
19.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Exceptional
14.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
13.2%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Excellent
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
8.9%

Chippewa vs Cypriot Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 103.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 53.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 9.3%).
Chippewa vs Cypriot Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaCypriot
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Poor
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.0%

Chippewa vs Cypriot Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 29.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 3.5%).
Chippewa vs Cypriot Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaCypriot
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Tragic
33.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
84.1%

Chippewa vs Cypriot Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 67.9%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 57.8%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 3.3%).
Chippewa vs Cypriot Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaCypriot
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
63.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
25.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Exceptional
48.0%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Exceptional
27.0%

Chippewa vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 65.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 50.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 7.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 29.5%).
Chippewa vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaCypriot
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
15.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
84.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
50.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
16.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
5.0%

Chippewa vs Cypriot Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 100.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 90.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 68.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
Chippewa vs Cypriot Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaCypriot
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
72.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Exceptional
67.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Exceptional
56.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
49.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
21.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
6.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

Chippewa vs Cypriot Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 59.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 48.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 6.0%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.0%).
Chippewa vs Cypriot Disability
Disability MetricChippewaCypriot
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
20.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Exceptional
43.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Excellent
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%