Chippewa vs Bahamian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bahamian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Bahamians

Fair
Tragic
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bahamian Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,406,716 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Bahamians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 23.4 Bahamians.
Chippewa Integration in Bahamian Communities

Chippewa vs Bahamian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 23.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $75,395, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $51,000, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $35,125, a difference of 0.35%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $36,427, a difference of 0.56%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $69,726, a difference of 1.2%).
Chippewa vs Bahamian Income
Income MetricChippewaBahamian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Tragic
$36,427
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Tragic
$82,631
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Tragic
$69,726
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Tragic
$39,735
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Tragic
$44,756
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Tragic
$35,125
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Tragic
$45,743
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Tragic
$75,395
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Tragic
$81,369
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Tragic
$51,000
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Exceptional
20.2%

Chippewa vs Bahamian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 18.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.36%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and poverty (15.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Chippewa vs Bahamian Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaBahamian
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
15.4%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
16.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
21.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
16.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
14.6%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
18.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
15.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
17.0%

Chippewa vs Bahamian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 52.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Chippewa vs Bahamian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaBahamian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.9%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
11.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.3%

Chippewa vs Bahamian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 26.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Chippewa vs Bahamian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaBahamian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Tragic
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
82.2%

Chippewa vs Bahamian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 23.8%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 0.99%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.28, a difference of 2.4%).
Chippewa vs Bahamian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaBahamian
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
40.5%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.28
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
41.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Tragic
40.8%

Chippewa vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 49.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 27.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.53%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.0%).
Chippewa vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaBahamian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
16.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
5.1%

Chippewa vs Bahamian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 36.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.74%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.76%).
Chippewa vs Bahamian Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaBahamian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Poor
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Tragic
89.9%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Tragic
87.5%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
60.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Tragic
41.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
32.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
12.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Chippewa vs Bahamian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 43.3%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 40.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.13%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.88%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.0%).
Chippewa vs Bahamian Disability
Disability MetricChippewaBahamian
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
24.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%